Week 1: Advanced Leadership and Health Management Course with The University of Lahore

Leadership in Action: Highlights from Week One

In a global landscape of increasing and diversifying innovation, lifestyle and demand, it is well-established that the complexity of public healthcare provision requires a co-ordinated approach across communities, cultures, and disciplines1.   

As such leadership is a vital part of public healthcare delivery, and championing good leadership is crucial to empowering professionals, populations and patients alike to collaborate and problem-solve2.  This plays an integral role, particularly when addressing more challenging ‘wicked problems’ in healthcare, i.e., problems which are difficult to define and consequently difficult to solve due to their multifactorial and complex nature, for example, climate change, poverty, and health inequity3,4.

The COVID-19 pandemic is one of many recent examples that have brought this to the forefront of public attention. More so than before, this required dynamism, innovation, systems thinking, and an element of risk-taking, from leaders and stakeholders across multiple spheres of healthcare and policy.

Infographic showing NHS leadership model

Leadership itself has many definitions. Often, conceptual frameworks are used to characterise what are deemed the most important attributes of a leader the National Health Service (NHS) Healthcare Leadership Model (above), or the International Hospital Federation’s (IHF) Global Healthcare Leadership Competency Model (below)5,6

Infographic of IHF global healthcare leadership competency model

The first week of the WHO Collaborating Centre’s Advanced Leadership and Health Management Training programme focused on these principles. Their application was discussed across a range of individual and public health contexts, including evaluating emotional intelligence, exploring public health ethical frameworks, leadership during emergencies and crises, and epidemic management.

The cohort comprised 16 senior health leaders and professionals across multiple institutions from Lahore, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, including the University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Sehat Medical Complex, and Central Park Medical College. Participants were from disciplines and positions within health education, business, management, and clinical practice, with a diversity of experience in healthcare leadership between them.

Sessions on the programme were scheduled over 5 full 9 am-4 pm days at Imperial’s White City Campus and were centred around the key leadership competencies as set by the WHO EURO7. This includes themes of evidence-based decision-making, developing clear vision and mission and effective communication, managing change in academia and healthcare, and stakeholder engagement and governance.

Over the week, activities were largely practical and interactive (with a hybrid online structure for those unable to join in-person). Sessions were delivered by experts and leaders in the public health sphere; Dr Richard Pinder, Dr Alex Carter, Tina Purnat PhDc, the WHOCC team – Celine Tabche PhDc, Professor Salman Rawaf, Ela Augustyniak, Rachel Barker – and the Simulation Centre Team at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital – Marco, Kim, Aurora, and Mark.  Their areas of expertise are wide-ranging, spanning public health education, policy and economics, research, advocacy, and management on national and global scales, and their support and experience were invaluable to the programme.

WHAT CHARACTERISES HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP?

Health is universal, which results in diversity of experiences, perspectives and ideologies globally. Even though there is increasing globalisation and transfer of health information, practices and resources, at the centre of healthcare are people and their communities, which are constantly changing, and whose demands are different from the next8,9. Therefore, healthcare leadership must be able to accommodate and meet these wide-ranging demands.

Furthermore, there is a close relationship between health and wider environmental, cultural and contextual influences – not just for an individual leader, but also for those communities and teams for whom the leader must provide10.  Community members, including trusted faith leaders or local authority figures, are often best placed to advise on their local population’s unique needs, assets, and customs11

However, within healthcare, there are often multiple complex problems with a web of interdependent factors that are contributing. Consequently, negotiating, co-ordinating and facilitating multiple health initiatives, simultaneously, with finite resources, is a common challenge12.

A leader is best when people barely know he exists. When his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves."

Thus, the importance of multidisciplinary working is highlighted, as is the appreciation that healthcare innovators and leaders are not necessarily clinicians13.  This is evidenced by the effectiveness of stakeholder and patient engagement, and community-led health initiatives worldwide14

One example of note is in Liberia. Local farmers have used community-led agricultural initiatives to not only address food insecurity by sustainably improving local food supply, but also to address other issues within the community15. This includes the systemic barriers to land ownership by young and female farmers, and to rebuild bonds within the community following the civil wars and periods of political unrest. 

Another study on community-led monitoring in South Africa empowered local communities to take the lead on some health system data collection and decision-making processes16. This yielded numerous positive outcomes including increased operational efficiency, and sustainable health solutions specific to the health system environment.

In a session run by Professor Salman Rawaf, participants in the programme explored the unique responsibilities and challenges faced by leaders in healthcare, and their impacts on healthcare governance and processes. This was an opportunity to discern the most effective leadership approaches, given healthcare demands. 

These ideas were brought together in an interactive exercise on the theories of change management and their applications and nuances in healthcare settings. This covered strategies and best practice for cultivating and leading change initiatives in healthcare.

Guest speaker, Dr Alex Carter, illustrated these points from the perspective of hospital management and operations, considering best practice to enhance efficiency of systems within the hospital including workflow, staff management, and essential administration. These culminate to improve patient outcomes.

SELF-REFLECTION AND TYPES OF LEADERSHIP

Self-awareness and self-love matter. Who we are is how we lead."

Within healthcare, reflection is a key requirement to improve both clinical and non-clinical practice.18 Recognising the impacts of personal influences, on bias and leadership type are invaluable to being a compassionate, adaptable, and effective leader. Tools, including the Myers-Briggs Assessment, the 4 Colours of Insights Framework, and emotional intelligence frameworks such as EQ-i are designed to facilitate this19-21

Participants in the programme had the opportunity to reflect on their healthcare leadership styles and experiences through various interactive speaker sessions, case studies, a private museum visit, workshops and simulations. This included an emotional intelligence assessment, and leadership styles exercises led by the WHOCC team.  These exercises were designed to identify personal leadership strengths and weaknesses and to shape learning and development goals going forward.

Over the course of the week, these encouraged thoughtful discussion on a range of communication, decision-making, and organisational preferences.  There was also a deeper understanding of what motivates everyone and how this shapes their work ethic and leadership style.

“I loved the insights into my own leadership style, strengths and how to improve my weaknesses.”
Feedback from a programme participant

THE WISDOM OF THE MOUNTAIN

The ancient Chinese parable, ‘The Wisdom of the Mountain’ highlights another key leadership principle23. It tells of an enlightened master, Hwan, and his disciple of twenty years, Lao-li who both reside at the top of a mountain.

Despite his determination, Lao-li struggled to reach enlightenment during this time. He consequently told Hwan that he would leave the mountain and, with it, his search for wisdom. Hwan told Lao-li he would join him on his descent, but first asked him what he could see from their position on the mountain peak. Lao-li responded by describing the rising sun and the many picturesque mountains surrounding them. They then began their journey.

Once they had reached the foot of the mountain, Hwan once again asked Lao-li what he could see from their position. This time, Lao-li described animals in the meadows and the bustling town ahead.

Hwan asked Lao-li what he had learned: his question was met with silence.  The master explained that their journey bore close resemblance to the journey to enlightenment. Without seeing the views from both the top and bottom of the mountain, the mind is closed off to the full view, and thus is closed off from the learning that the full view can provide.

In this parable, being open to learning, reflecting, and looking at problems from different perspectives is key to both personal development and good leadership. It also highlights that, at first, a leader may not have the whole view, but awareness of this limitation will help illuminate the best steps forward to overcome it.

This harks back to multidisciplinary leadership in healthcare and emphasises the importance of continued learning and self-management. Combined with effective communication in multidisciplinary working to engage different stakeholders, this also contributes to evidence-based decision-making. Leaders can evaluate evidence from a variety of sources and insights to make as balanced and widely beneficial a solution as possible.

At an organisational level within the WHO, these principles are central to multiple aspects of their previous and current strategic plans. Inward reflection and evaluation, and functional reviews launched in regional offices, underline where strengths lie and where improvements can be made24,25. Combined with continued innovation, collaboration, research, training, and upskilling, the needs and assets of the surrounding communities can be better understood and considered in decision-making25.

Within the programme, these elements were developed over several sessions.

At the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Simulation Centre, the Simulation Team led interactive sessions concentrated on evidence-based leadership and decision making. Gathering and analysing evidence, with consideration of multiple human factors, created a solid foundation for balanced problem-solving and effecting change in these scenarios. A later session by guest speaker Tina Purnat on ‘Combating Misinformation: Leadership Evaluation and Decision-making’, emphasised the importance of evaluating evidence, systemic thinking and the impacts of misinformation on decisions and organisational outcomes, and dealing with misinformation in decision-making.

The WHOCC Team’s Ela Augustyniak, Celine Tabche and Rachel Barker on ‘Principles of Communication in Healthcare Settings’, and ‘Health Literacy, Active Listening, and Feedback Techniques’, worked to recognise personal styles of communication, and to develop techniques for rapport-building and effective feedback.

Building on these essential skills, a session run by guest speaker Dr Richard Pinder on ‘Communication Strategies for Diverse Stakeholders’ focused on identifying key stakeholders and using tailored communication and effective engagement strategies for collaboration, decision-making, and leadership.

This could then be put into practice with ‘Action plan development Roleplaying’ exercises run by Professor Salman Rawaf and Celine Tabche, which required application and leadership in a hospital outbreak context, and ‘Case Studies and Group Discussions on Continuous Development’, also run by Celine Tabche, involving the analysis and reflection of stakeholder engagement and governance in real-world scenarios.

WEEK ONE: A SUMMARY

Over week 1, participants covered a range of key healthcare leadership principles and skills to further develop their professional practice. Cohort feedback underlined the value in developing interpersonal skills including communication, understanding wider health frameworks and their interactions with human factors, and the importance of self-reflection and development as pillars of best practice.

It has been a great pleasure to hear and learn from the insights of such a diverse cohort, and we look forward to reconnecting with everyone in Lahore in November for week two of the course!

Special thanks go to Dr Richard Pinder, Dr Alex Carter, Tina Purnat, the WHOCC team, and the Simulation Centre Team at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital for their incredible work delivering the course!

Please keep an eye out for more exciting updates from us on this in the coming weeks!

Written by: Ishani Sharma, Intern

Reviewed and edited by: Ela Augustyniak, Project Manager & Celine Tabche, Teaching Fellow

REFERENCES

  1. Rod NH, Broadbent A, Rod MH, Russo F, Arah OA, Stronks K. Complexity in Epidemiology and Public Health. Addressing Complex Health Problems Through a Mix of Epidemiologic Methods and Data. Epidemiology. 2023 Jul 1;34(4):505-514. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001612. Epub 2023 May 30. PMID: 37042967; PMCID: PMC10712344.
  2. Czabanowska K. Leadership in Public Health: Reducing Inequalities and Improving Health. EuroHealth International. 2014. 20(3). https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/332826/Eurohealth-20-3-28-31-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#:~:text=With%20direct%20access%20to%20public,have%20significant%20potential%20for%20success.&text=The%20development%20of%20strong%20and,is%20essential%20at%20all%20levels. (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  3. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci4, 155–169 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  4. Interaction Design Foundation – IxDF. (2016, June 4). What are Wicked Problems?. Interaction Design Foundation – IxDF. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/wicked-problems (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  5. NHS Leadership Academy. Explore the Healthcare Leadership Model. https://www.leadershipacademy.nhs.uk/healthcare-leadership-model/explore-the-healthcare-leadership-model/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  6. International Hospital Federation.Global Healthcare Leadership Competency Model 2023; Competencies for future-focused leadership. 2023 https://ihf-fih.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/IHF-Global-Healthcare-Leadership-Competency-Model-2023.pdf (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  7. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.) WHO-ASPHER competency framework for the public health workforce in the European Region. 2020. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.  https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/347866 (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  8. Bettcher D, Lee K. Globalisation and public health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2002;56:8-17.
  9. World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Western Pacific. People-centred health care: a policy framework. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290613176 (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  10. World Health Organisation. In what ways do cultural contexts influence the knowledge translation process for health decision-making and what are the implications for policy and practice? Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report. 2022. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/9789289058353 (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  11. Seale, H., Harris-Roxas, B., Heywood, A. et al.The role of community leaders and other information intermediaries during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the multicultural sector in Australia. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9, 174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01196-3
  12. Walsh N, de Sarandy S. The practice of collaborative leadership: Across health and care services. The King’s Fund. 2023. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/reports/practice-collaborative-leadership (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  13. World Health Organisation. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Open Mindsets: Participatory Leadership for Health. Flagship Report 2016. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/251458/9789241511360-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  14. The Voices Project. Asia Pacific’s Patient Engagement Dilemma: The Case for Patient Centricity and Continuous Patient Engagement in Diagnostic Care in Asia Pacific. https://rochediagram.com/wp-content/uploads/Patient-Engagement-Whitepaper_Final.pdf (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  15. Smith IM. Movement for Community Led Development in Liberia (MCLD-Liberia) Farmers Spearheading Community Led Development in Liberia. Foodtank. 2023. https://foodtank.com/news/2023/02/farmers-spearheading-community-led-development-in-liberia/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  16. Tshuma N, Elakpa DN, Moyo C, Soboyisi M, Moyo S, Mpofu S, Chadyiwa M, Malahlela M, Tiba C, Mnkandla D, Ndhlovu TM, Moruthoane T, Mphuthi DD, Mtapuri O. The Transformative Impact of Community-Led Monitoring in the South African Health System: A Comprehensive Analysis. Int J Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;69:1606591. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606591. PMID: 38420516; PMCID: PMC10899425.
  17. Bracho A. Latino Health Access. What happens when patients become leaders on the health team? 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxCG6d4LiGQ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  18. Koshy K, Limb C, Gundogan B, Whitehurst K, Jafree DJ. Reflective practice in health care and how to reflect effectively. Int J Surg Oncol (N Y). 2017 Jul;2(6):e20. doi: 10.1097/IJ9.0000000000000020. Epub 2017 Jun 15. PMID: 29177215; PMCID: PMC5673148. (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  19. Myers & Briggs Foundat Myers-Briggs Overview. 2024. https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/myers-briggs-overview/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  20. Bonner K. A Guide of How Insights Discovery Can Change Your Understanding of People at Work and Home. 2018. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/guide-how-insights-discovery-can-change-your-people-work-bonner/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  21. EQ-i. The EQ-i 2.0 Model. https://hpsys.com/EI_EQ-i2.0Home.htm (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  22. D. Strategies Team. What Are The Different Leadership Styles? The Business Intelligence Team. 2023. https://blog.biz-intelligence.app/what-are-the-different-leadership-styles/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  23. Chan Kim W, Mauborgne R. Parables of Leadership. The Wisdom of the Mountain. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1992/07/parables-of-leadership (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  24. World Health Organisation. WHO Result Report – Programme Budget 2018-2019: Leadership and Enabling Functions. https://www.who.int/about/accountability/results/2018-2019/leadership/ (Accessed 24/7/2024)
  25. World Health Organisation. Draft fourteenth general programme of work, 2025-2028. 2024. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA77/A77_16-en.pdf (Accessed 24/7/2024)